Difference between revisions of "IDE architecture design"
From stgo
(→Pro & Contra) |
(→A - Central Server Architecture) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=== A - Central Server Architecture === | === A - Central Server Architecture === | ||
| − | + | El Imagen abajo muestra una IDE simple, con 2 servidores (Servidor Mapas + Servidor con Base de Datos) | |
| + | [[File:CEDEUS_Physical_Architecture_-_central.png|450px|thumb|left|Arquitectura Observatorio CEDEUS - tipo "central"]] | ||
=== B - Distributed Multi-Server Architecture === | === B - Distributed Multi-Server Architecture === | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 4 November 2013
>> return to Cedeus IDE
Contents
What Architectural Models exist
A - Central Server Architecture
El Imagen abajo muestra una IDE simple, con 2 servidores (Servidor Mapas + Servidor con Base de Datos)
File:CEDEUS Physical Architecture - central.png
Arquitectura Observatorio CEDEUS - tipo "central"
B - Distributed Multi-Server Architecture
SDI case
Pro & Contra
possible criteria:
- user access management
- data security (against un-wanted access)
- backups
- power outages
- performance (serving data => scalability vs. multi-access)
- base-data
- server needs (registry server, web server, base-db server)
- maintenance needs (people, software updates/time)
- ...
